Reconstructing the Book of Mormon

Review of M. Gerald Bradford and Alison V. P. Coutts, eds. Uncovering the Original Text of the Book of Mormon: History and Findings of the Critical Text Project. Provo, Utah: FARMS, 2002. vi + 74 pp. $9.95.

Reconstructing the Book of Mormon

Reviewed by John A. Tvedtnes

In October 2001, FARMS and other BYU entities sponsored a symposium marking the
publication of the first volumes of Royal Skousen’s critical text study
of the original and printer’s manuscripts of the Book of Mormon.1 M. Gerald
Bradford and Alison V. P. Coutts prepared the symposium papers for publication
in a seventy-four-page booklet sent to all FARMS subscribers and made available
for purchase by others.

Skousen’s introductory paper details the history of the critical text project
of the Book of Mormon from its inception in 1988 until the present. Skousen describes
how he was granted access to the manuscripts, including fragments in private
collections. He illustrates the differences between the manuscripts and published
editions, noting the kinds of errors that often occurred when taking dictation,
hand copying from a manuscript, and typesetting in the nineteenth century.

The paper by Robert J. Espinosa of BYU’s Harold B. Lee Library describes the
fragments of the original manuscript and the process by which they were opened
and photographed for study. His detailed explanation is accompanied by photos
that bring the project to life for the reader.

Ron Romig, archivist for the Community of Christ (formerly Reorganized Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints), describes the printer’s manuscript,
which is owned by that church and was made available for photography and study
for the critical text project. Larry W. Draper, curator in the Harold B. Lee
Library, described various Book of Mormon editions. His article is accompanied
by excellent drawings that illustrate the printing process used during the nineteenth

The next chapter in the booklet—and the one that most interested me—is
Royal Skousen’s “The Systematic Text of the Book of Mormon.”
In this paper, Skousen describes some of the apparent errors that appear in published
editions of the Book of Mormon, comparing them with the text as found in the manuscripts
and recommending various emendations as a preview of what will be included in
subsequent volumes resulting from the critical text study. The article is very
informative and should be read by every serious reader of the Book of Mormon.

I find myself disagreeing with one of Skousen’s recommended emendations. In
Mosiah 19:24, he suggests reading “after they had ended the sermon”
instead of “after they had ended the ceremony.” He writes, “The
word ceremony does not make sense here, nor is there any older meaning of the
word that might work” (p. 64). I assume that he has not read my chapter
on “the Nephite Purification Ceremony,” in which I explain that the
Nephites mentioned in this passage had just killed King Noah, an act that would
have called for purification under the law of Moses.2 If Skousen has read that
piece, perhaps he disagrees with my assessment, in which case he may give his
reasons in one of his forthcoming volumes.

I hope to see Skousen also deal with the expression “midst of dark(w|n)ess”
in Alma 5:7, which I long have thought should read “mist of darkness,”
as in 1 Nephi 8:23-24 and 1 Nephi 12:4.3 Skousen reads the printer’s manuscript
as “mi{d}st of darkness,” evidently suggesting that the d was added
as an afterthought.4 I suspect that this is an error.

The final article is Daniel C. Peterson’s “A Response: ‘What the
Manuscripts and the Eyewitnesses Tell Us about the Translation of the Book of
Mormon.’ ” Peterson explains the translation process as described by eyewitnesses,
thus helping us envision what went on during the time the Prophet Joseph Smith
dictated the English translation of the Nephite record to Oliver Cowdery.

Bradford and Coutts have done an excellent job in pulling together the various
papers and associated photographs and artwork under the watchful eye of Royal
Skousen. The layout and content of the booklet are excellent, and I highly recommend
the volume to readers of the Book of Mormon and others interested in the study
and preservation of manuscripts.

  1. Royal Skousen, ed., The Original Manuscript of the Book of Mormon (Provo,
    Utah: FARMS, 2001); and The Printer’s Manuscript of the Book of Mormon, 2
    parts (Provo, Utah: FARMS, 2002).
  2. See chapter 24 in John A. Tvedtnes, The Most Correct Book: Insights from
    a Book of Mormon Scholar
    (Salt Lake City: Cornerstone, 1999), 176-93
  3. This expression appears twice in the King James Version of the New Testament
    —in Acts 13:11 (“a mist and a darkness”) and in 2 Peter 2:17 (“the
    mist of darkness”).
  4. Skousen, Printer’s Manuscript, 1:410.